Recent Posts (page 31 / 37)

by Quentin Lewis

Quentin's Weeknotes 12/28/19-01/3/20

This week:

  • [youtube https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NSgHGFuPNus&w=560&h=315]
  • I started the week on vacation in Toronto and ended it back at work, in a new year and new decade. I’m mostly trying to get back into the rhythm of the Museum, which will be fairly busy this coming Spring. We’ll have a new exhibit in early February, multiple programs (including our first-in-a-long-time concert next week, featuring John O’Connor), and a big push for some intensive collections work. Also, I’m teaching Collections Management again, which will probably be slightly different this year than in previous iterations, as we have some big external projects that we are going to help with.
  • I grabbed a copy of the new Hallelujah the Hills album “I’m you”. It’s a tuneful, strange, exuberantly hopeful album. I’m thinking a lot about this lyric, from the title track:

Don’t quit, it only makes your enemies glad
They’d celebrate your decision, then feast on what you had
The rolling hills of lifer-arcs reflect the light from distant stars
Don’t quit, it only makes your enemies glad

by Quentin Lewis

Book Notes- Marx at the Arcade--Consoles, Controllers, and Class Struggle

Marx at the Arcade: Consoles, Controllers, and Class Struggle

By Jamie Woodcock

Finished 12/22/2019

 

A Marxist analysis of video games, along the axis of production (historical-material and labor relations) and consumption (games as play/anti-work, hacking, and online communities).

Woodcock takes Stuart Hall’s call for understanding popular culture as a site of social struggle. He uses video games as a locus for such analysis, examining their history, the class composition of their production, their links to imperialism and state violence, and their consumption.

His history of video games is rich, though still partial, highlighting their connections to military technological development as well as the anti-work philosophy and lifestyle of the counter-cultural people who ended up working on the earliest computers at Universities and corportions.  These two trends (hierarchical control and experimental “hacking”) for the nexus of video-game labor relations to this day, with big multi-national companies attempting to regiment, deskill, and control a labor force (programmers and designers) that is still rooted in creativity, loves their own product (he uses the term “playbour”), and rejects the ideas of work handed down from fordism, particularly a clock-punching eight hour day. As a consequence, the major labor issues inherent in the video game industry are the problems crunch time (long, hard hours as a project nears its end) and a tolerance for White, masculinist ideologies among workers, leading to the exclusion of women and people of color from success and advancement. He concludes with some discussions of efforts at unionization in the gaming industry, and the problems and possibilities of organizing a highly precarious but well paid labor force.

The second half of the book focuses on the consumption of games, and the ways in which the messages of many games repeat dominant ideologies that reify class relations and state power. At the same time, he also focuses on some alternative games that play against such ideologies, as well as the idea that experimental play inherent in video games may allow players to reconfigure or improvise alternatives to powerful ideas and social relations. There is also a simple but thorough discussion of the Gamergate phenomenon, largely framed as an anti-diversity patriarchal backlash movement. Overall, it was nice to see an analysis of games that recognized some of the ways that their ideas are problematic, while still locating them as an important site of cultural production, community-building, and counter-hegemonic activity.

As a gamer, it was fun and enlightening to read a critical history of an activity that I’ve loved for a long time. As a progressive with an interesting in labor politics, it was enlightening and inspiring to read about the complexities of organizing in the new flexible-information economy, in a way that provides pathways for future action.

by Quentin Lewis

My yearnotes for 2019

via GIPHY

My year, professionally:

My media consumption was a bit more sparse than in previous years, but I still found some interesting things to read and see and listen to this year.

Other things:

  • Our street hosted a block-long garage sale, which combined three of my favorite things–community building, material culture, and sitting outside.

  • I wrote about 25,000 words of fiction this yea. I had planned on trying to finish a novel this year, but that wasn’t really in the cards. I struggled with a YA novel for the first part of the year before abandoning it after about 12,000 words. Since then I’ve been trying to find the time to finish editing a long-ish short story (close to 8K words before it’s done) that I’m going to finish before the year rolls out.

  • I took care of my family, and they took care of me.

    • Sometimes this took the form of getting our house into the home we want it to be. We painted two rooms, put up a lot of artwork, re-worked our living room, and whipped our garden into better shape. I used a stump grinder for the first time, which was an exhiliarating experience.
    • Sometimes it took the form of visiting new places. Various combinations of us went to the Museum of Science and Technology in Syracuse, NY, Robot City Games in Binghamton, NY, Longwood Gardens in Chester County, PA, and riding the Cooperstown and Charlotte Valley Railroad. Additionally we visited King of Prussia, PA and Salem, MA, and both times in the company of the Minister of Intrigue and his family. He and I have been friends for a long, long time and we are finally living in (basically) the same part of the world. It was delightful to see him and his family and I’m looking forward to getting together more regularly from now on.
    • Sometimes it took the form of celebrating. I turned 40! I had a legitimately great birthday, thanks to my lovely wife who went to Leslie Nope-levels of planning and forethought to make it special
    • My son continues to delight, confuse, and inspire me with his boundless curiousity, energy and creativity. This was a year where I felt like I could start sharing some of my favorite things with him, in music, literature, and film.
    • My wife is an unparalled and devoted partner in everything I do, and I love her so much for her humor, her moral clarity, and her perseverence in adversity.
    • Finally, my year was overshadowed and forged and propelled by the birth of my daughter in late December of last year. Basically everything I did (or didn’t do) was a product of her presence, and her growth into the delightful and curious person she’s becoming, and which I’m honored and bewildered to watch and shepherd. So this was her year, even as it was also mine.
by Quentin Lewis

Quentin's Weeknotes 11/30/19-12/6/19

This Week:

by Quentin Lewis

Quentin's Weeknotes 11/2/19-11/8/19

This Week:

by Quentin Lewis

Quentin's Weeknotes 10/26/19-11/1/19

This week:

by Quentin Lewis

Quentin's Weeknotes 10/19/19-10-25/19

This Week:

by Quentin Lewis

Quentin's Weeknotes 10/12/19-10/18/19

Quentin’s Weeknotes:

Try to understand the science. Try to tell the truth. Try to find a medium in which to tell the truth. Try to extend the envelope in which you will be permitted to tell the truth. Prophecy is over. Persuasion is over. Action is the last thing left. Rebellion is the last thing left. Stay steady in the face of it all. Do what you can. Write that. Record that. Try to pass helpful messages between practical, determined people.

  • I read archaeologist Paul Mullins' lengthy blog post on recent (and historical) attempts to exhume the body of gangster John Dillinger in Indianapolis. Dillinger’s fame as a criminal and his legacy have spurred many ad-hoc (and sometimes vandalizing) memorialization efforts, including possibly the removal of his body or parts theoreof from his grave. Mullins uses the recent efforts by Dillinger’s descendants to exhume the body for verification as a vantage point for thinking about fame, spectacle, memorialization, and death, and the ways in variable ways in which we remember public figures.
by Quentin Lewis

Book Notes: Landscapes: John Berger on Art

Landscapes: John Berger on Art

by John Berger

 

Finished 10/8/2019

 

I only knew John Berger by reputation. His book Ways of Seeing (and the accompanying BBC series) were the onramp of many of my friends and colleagues to Marxism and critical theory.

This book collects some of Berger’s essays on art, though that catch-all is rather loosely interpreted, given the broad tonal and thematic content herein. There are memoir-like reminiscences of his youth, essays on marxism in a post-soviet world, travelogues in palestine and Israel, and thoughts on Walter Benjamin and Rosa Luxembourg. These subjects seem perhaps unrelated to what we generally think of as “art” but it comes through in Berger’s insistence that we not lose sight of the aesthetic and emotional qualities of political struggle, and the ways in which we apprehend (and therefore understand) our political and social situation is conditioned by our relationship to art and aesthetics. Likewise, his fierce ethical compass shines through, especially his belief that art, as a social category, must be disentangled from property.

The essays I enjoyed the most included a deep dive into the revolutionary nature of cubism, and his thoughtful analysis of drawings as a medium and as a way of imperfectly capturing intangible experiences like memories. I also found myself nodding along reading his essay on the history of Museums, and thinking about whether they are redeemable, given their origins in propping up power. But I also liked several of political essays, including his thoughts on the fall of Berlin Wall, with its deeply humanistic though cautious championing of the collapse of Soviet-style communism. Likewise, his essay “Ten Dispatches about Place” in which he addresses the question of whether one can be a Marxist absent a living model of a socialist society. 

His writing is always clear and impassioned, complex and rich but not dense. This book was a great introduction to Berger, and I’m looking forward to reading more of this brilliant, ethical, and thoughtful scholar.                     

by Quentin Lewis

Quentin's Weeknotes 10/5/19-10/11/19

This Week: